!

To read more about Senator Lankford’s border security policy proposal, CLICK HERE.

Lankford Leads Letter to Urge USAID to Prevent US from Funding Abortions, Abortion Advocacy Abroad

OKLAHOMA CITY, OK – Senator James Lankford (R-OK) and Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers (WA-05) today led a bicameral letter to the Acting Administrator for the US Agency for International Development (USAID) John Barsa to urge him to protect American taxpayer dollars during the coronavirus pandemic from funding pro-abortion lobbying or advocacy efforts in other countries via the United Nations (UN) in violation of the Siljander Amendment, which prevents State Department funds from being used to lobby about abortion. In December 2018 Lankford led eight senators to send a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo regarding the use of American tax dollars to lobby for abortions in Latin America.

Joining Lankford in the letter to Administrator Barsa are Senators Jim Inhofe (R-OK), Steve Daines (R-MT), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Mike Braun (R-IN), Kelly Loeffler (R-GA), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Rob Portman (R-OH), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Tim Scott (R-SC), and Jerry Moran (R-KS).

”We agree with you that the ‘UN should not use this crisis as an opportunity to advance access to abortion as an ‘essential service.’’ Your insistence that UN agreements and activities should be neutral on abortion is crucial to enforcing the Siljander amendment, so that the billions of US taxpayer dollars given annually to the UN are not used to lobby for abortion. To that end, we also urge additional action to protect US funds from being used by UN organizations to perform or promote abortions,” the members wrote.

“The UN’s COVID-19 Global Humanitarian Response Plan is only the latest example of the UN’s brazen imposition of abortion and a fictitious international right to abortion, which violates the sovereignty of its member states and UN conventions that affirm the right to life,” the members continued. “UN organizations that lobby for abortion include the World Health Organization,  the United Nations Population Fund,  the UN Commission on Human Rights,  and the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women.  

“Therefore, we also urge additional action to protect US funds from being used by UN organizations to perform or promote abortions.”

Text of the letter can be found here and below.

Dear Acting Administrator Barsa,

Thank you for your letter to the United Nations (UN) Secretary General on May 18, 2020 opposing the egregious imposition of abortion and abortion-inducing drugs under the guise of “sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services” and its derivatives in the UN’s COVID-19 Global Humanitarian Response Plan (Global HRP). We agree with you that the “UN should not use this crisis as an opportunity to advance access to abortion as an ‘essential service.’” Your insistence that UN agreements and activities should be neutral on abortion is crucial to enforcing the Siljander amendment, so that the billions of US taxpayer dollars given annually to the UN are not used to lobby for abortion. To that end, we also urge additional action to protect US funds from being used by UN organizations to perform or promote abortions.

As you know, the Siljander Amendment, renewed annually since 1981 in the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs appropriations bill, prohibits US funds from being “used to lobby for or against abortion”. The intent of the amendment is, in the words of its sponsor, Rep. Mark Siljander, “to get the US Government out of the business of financing the lobbying, promoting, and recommending of abortion”. The Siljander Amendment exists to protect the sovereignty of nations to enact their own laws and policies regarding abortion.

United States leaders and diplomats should insist that US-supported international agreements and multilateral assistance do not include abortion under the guise of sexual and reproductive health. This insistence is necessary to enforce the Siljander Amendment. This oversight is especially necessary for UN organizations that receive billions of dollars in US funding that are subject to the Siljander Amendment.

We join you in insisting that unqualified references to sexual and reproductive health or derivative terms that that can be interpreted to include abortion should be rejected in international agreements and assistance like the Global HRP. The Global HRP promotes abortion as having the same level of necessity as food through its provisions to “secure the continuity of the supply chain for essential commodities and services such as… sexual and reproductive health” and other provisions to accelerate “sexual and reproductive health services, including the Minimum Initial Service Package”. Since 2018, the UN-sponsored Inter-Agency Field Manual on Reproductive Health in Humanitarian Settings Minimum Initial Service Package for sexual and reproductive health explicitly includes “access to safe abortion to the full extent of the law” and provides for supplies for abortion, like manual vacuum aspiration and abortion-inducing drugs in humanitarian-response kits. Such references to abortion under sexual and reproductive health should be removed from the Global HRP and the UN’s priorities in response to COVID-19 pandemic.

The UN’s COVID-19 Global Humanitarian Response Plan is only the latest example of the UN’s brazen imposition of abortion and a fictitious international right to abortion, which violates the sovereignty of its member states and UN conventions that affirm the right to life. UN organizations that lobby for abortion include the World Health Organization,  the United Nations Population Fund, the UN Commission on Human Rights, and the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women.  

Therefore, we also urge additional action to protect US funds from being used by UN organizations to perform or promote abortions. To enforce the Siljander Amendment, US contributions to UN Secretary General and to UN organizations that lobby for abortion should be reduced in amounts proportional to their abortion-related lobbying, as was done to the Organization of American States (OAS) in 2019. Furthermore, the exemption for multilateral organizations from Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance (PLGHA) should be revoked. US tax dollars should not finance UN organizations that perform or promote abortion as a method of family planning through voluntary contributions, including for global health activities. Such an expansion of PLGHA is allowed under section 301(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 USC. 2221(a)), which authorizes the President to condition voluntary contributions to international organizations on “such terms and conditions as he may determine”.

Again, we thank you for your strong stand against the imposition of abortion under the guise of sexual and reproductive health in the UN’s Global HRP. We urge you to continue to these efforts, which serve to enforce, and by no means violate, the Siljander Amendment. We also urge action to protect US funds from being used by UN organizations to perform or promote abortions. Thank you for your efforts to protect vulnerable unborn children as the US leads the world in providing humanitarian assistance to those in need.

Sincerely,

###

Print
Share
Like
Tweet