If you were impacted by storms on April 27 or May 6, CLICK HERE to find resources available for recovery.

Lankford, Crapo, Risch Introduce State Fiscal Flexibility Act

WASHINGTON, DC – Senator James Lankford (R-OK) joined Senators Mike Crapo (R-ID) and Jim Risch (R-ID) to introduce the “State Fiscal Flexibility Act”, a bill to eliminate a provision in the American Rescue Plan that prevents states from using relief funds to cut taxes.

“The Democrat’s COVID bill included many surprises and elements that had little or nothing to do with COVID, including a new provision to block states from giving tax relief to their citizens.  The federal government is way out of fiscal balance, but if a state is in balance and wants to give any tax relief to their citizens, the “COVID” bill threatens them with penalties,” said Lankford. “It is remarkable that the Democrat’s bill allows for pension bailouts for mismanaged states, but it blocks tax relief for well managed states.” 

“If a state like Idaho wants to provide tax relief in the interest of economic recovery, and to help people return to earning their livelihoods, the American Rescue Plan says it will be financially punished by the federal government,” said Crapo.  “This infringes on states’ authority to design their own fiscal policies, and invites partisan politics into federal and state relations.”

“Last year, Governor Little and the Idaho State Legislature cut red tape and limited government spending to put the state in the strongest possible position to emerge from this pandemic,” said Risch.  “Yet under Democrats’ COVID spending plan, poorly managed states receive a windfall while fiscally responsible states like Idaho are barred from providing tax relief to its citizens. With this legislation, financial competence will be rightly rewarded—not penalized.”

The American Rescue Plan includes a $350 billion bailout for states, rewarding those with poor fiscal management and punishing those who operated responsibly during the pandemic.  Funds can be used for virtually anything a state chooses to spend money on, with next to nothing in terms of constraints or restrictions.  However, there are two restrictions: one is that a state may not use recovery funds “for deposit into any pension fund,” and the other is that any state wishing to provide tax relief may do so, but only at a punishable cost.  The latter provision serves no useful purpose, other than to convey the message that tax cuts are not favored by the federal government.  The “State Fiscal Flexibility Act” would eliminate this provision, giving power back to the states to determine what fiscal policies will best serve their citizens.

Text of the legislation can be found HERE.  In addition to Lankford, Crapo, and Risch, Finance Committee Members Chuck Grassley (R-IA), John Cornyn (R-TX), Rob Portman (R-OH), Steve Daines (R-MT), and Todd Young (R-IN) are original co-sponsors of the measure.